CRAM MD5 протоколы және қауіпсіздігі

Network protocol
In cryptography, CRAM MD5 is a challenge–response authentication mechanism (CRAM) based on the HMAC MD5 algorithm. As one of the mechanisms supported by the Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL), it is often used in email software as part of SMTP Authentication and for the authentication of POP and IMAP users, as well as in applications implementing LDAP, XMPP, BEEP, and other protocols. When such software requires authentication over unencrypted connections, CRAM MD5 is preferred over mechanisms that transmit passwords "in the clear," such as LOGIN and PLAIN. However, it can't prevent derivation of a password through a brute force attack, so it is less effective than alternative mechanisms that avoid passwords or that use connections encrypted with Transport Layer Security (TLS).

No mutual authentication: the client does not verify the server. However, SASL authentication is usually done over a TLS connection, which verifies the server's identity. Weak password storage: some implementations require access to the users' plain text passwords, while others (e. g. Dovecot) use the intermediate step of the HMAC process to store the MD5 hash of the password (strictly speaking of HMAC's internal variables i key pad and o key pad). Such implementations leverage that for computing md5(something with 64 bytes || something else), only md5 internal(something with 64 bytes) and something else are needed to know (because of Merkle–Damgård usage in MD5; md5 internal is md5 without the final block). As i key pad and o key pad are at the start of the inner and outer hash of HMAC, and have a length of 64 bytes, this fact can be used. Threat of reversibility: an offline dictionary attack to recover the password is feasible after capturing a successful CRAM MD5 protocol exchange (e. g., using Cain & Abel). This threat is unavoidable in any password hashing scheme, but more modern algorithms use key stretching for increasing the cost of an attack by a factor of one thousand or more. Conversely, CRAM MD5 digests can be calculated using very few computational resources on dedicated hardware, or even just standard CPUs. Proxy ability: Unlike a password authenticated key agreement (PAKE) scheme, CRAM MD5 does not establish a secret shared between the two endpoints but unknown to an eavesdropper. An active man in the middle can therefore open a connection to the server, get a challenge, offer that challenge to the client, receive the client's response, and forward that response to the server. It can now drop the client's further messages while impersonating the client to the server.

CRAM MD5 is defined by the IETF standards track document RFC 2195, which supersedes RFC 2095, from earlier in 1997. These de facto standards define CRAM MD5 as an authentication method for the email mailbox management protocols POP and IMAP. CRAM MD5 is one of the authentication methods supported by Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL), defined in 2006 by RFC 4422, which supersedes the 1997 standard RFC 2222. The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) maintains a registry of SASL mechanisms, including CRAM MD5, for limited use. CRAM MD5 is required for On Demand Mail Relay (ODMR), defined in RFC 2645.

It was recommended to deprecate the standard in 20 November 2008. As an alternative it recommends e. g. SCRAM or SASL Plain protected by TLS instead.