Boeing X-50 Dragonfly

US experimental drone aircraft

The Boeing X 50A Dragonfly, formerly known as the Canard Rotor/Wing Demonstrator, was a VTOL rotor wing experimental unmanned aerial vehicle that was developed by Boeing and DARPA to demonstrate the principle that a helicopter's rotor could be stopped in flight and act as a fixed wing, enabling it to transition between fixed wing and rotary wing flight. The X 50A built upon the work of the Sikorsky S 72 X Wing program of the 1980s by designing the vehicle as a multi mode aircraft from the ground up. The X 50A was one of two projects funded by DARPA in its "Heliplane" program. Neither of the two prototype aircraft ever successfully transitioned to full forward flight. DARPA withdrew funding for the X 50 program in late 2006 due to inherent design flaws. Two proof of concept aircraft were built as part of the program. The X 50A's maiden flight took place on 24 November 2003.

The X 50 had a "canard" foreplane as well as a conventional tailplane, allowing both to contribute lift during forward flight and to offload the main rotor wing. For vertical take off, hovering, low speed flight, and vertical landing, the main rotor wing was driven by tip jets, by directing the exhaust from a jet engine through thrust nozzles in the rotor tips. Because the rotor is driven directly by jet thrust, there is no need for a tail rotor to control torque as in a conventional helicopter. For high speed forward flight, the exhaust is redirected through an ordinary jet nozzle and the rotor wing is stopped and held in a fixed position, as in a conventional airplane.

During the third flight of the prototype X 50A, on 23 March 2004, the vehicle crashed, as a result of cross coupling in the controls. A second, improved prototype ("Ship 2") was then built. On its sixth of 11 planned test flights, Ship 2 was completely destroyed in a crash at the Yuma Proving Ground on April 12, 2006. Subsequent investigation revealed that the aircraft's fuselage was subject to an aerodynamic pitching moment of extreme sensitivity. Both airspeed and rotor wake would produce a nose up pitching motion that was greater than the flight controls could compensate for.

Neither aircraft was able to achieve transition to full forward flight mode during the portions of the test flight program that were completed. In September, 2006, DARPA recognized the inherent design flaws and withdrew funding for the program.