Amiga 3000UX: Техникалық сипаттамалары мен бағасы

Commodore also announced the Amiga 2500UX with the same 68020 based specifications at the CeBIT show in early 1989. As the release of the Amiga 3000UX approached, the hardware requirements for Amiga 2000 systems running Unix were refined further, demanding an accelerator card providing a 68030 CPU and 68882 FPU, such as the A2630, more than 100 MB of hard drive storage, and a tape drive for installing the operating system. Thus, the Amiga 2500UX itself was based on the A2500/30 variant of the Amiga 2500.

Although the Amiga 3000UX could deliver a "responsive" experience, performance in the graphical environment was nevertheless described as being "on par with a slow 386 machine running SCO Open Desktop". Another evaluation of version 1.1 of the operating system described the X Window System performance as being "monochrome and slow as molasses", with an improved version 2.0 of the system to be made available, providing colour support in conjunction with the A2410 graphics board. This board was launched later in 1991, offering a 1024 x 1024 resolution with 8 bit colour depth, having been first announced in late 1988 as a collaboration with the University of Lowell. The Amiga 3000UX's base price of (approximately US$ today), rising to a reported $$7,713.00 with graphics board (priced separately at around $$1,000.00) and colour monitor, Later in the year, the Apollo DN2500, positioned as an entry level workstation with monochrome display by HP's Apollo division, cost only $$3,990.00 for a diskless model or $$5,490.00 with hard disk, eliminating the distinction between workstations and personal computers in pricing terms. The Sun 3/80 cost $$5,990.00 for a comparable entry level product. RISC based competitors offering superior performance were also already available at similar price levels as competition increased, such as the DECstation 2100 (reduced to $$5,950.00), and numerous SPARC workstations were anticipated at this $$5,000.00 price point during 1990. Sun's SPARCstation 1, introduced alongside the 3/80, had cost $$8,995.00 for the diskless version in 1989. Advertising for the system focused on Apple and NeXT as competitors, emphasising its adoption of System V, OPEN LOOK and X Window System technologies. However, within a year of its launch, the Amiga 3000UX's 68030 was already considered "one whole generation behind" the 68040 based NeXTstation, Later entry level workstations from established vendors upheld their aggressive pricing while increasing the performance gap. For example, the Personal DECstation 5000 Model 20 provided a newer CPU and was priced from only $$3,995.00 for a diskless configuration, with the faster Model 25 being available in a colour display configuration with hard disk for $$8,495.00. In an attempt to respond to the competitive situation, Commodore released version 2.1 of Amiga Unix in early 1992, reducing the price of an Amiga 3000UX system bundle featuring 9 MB of RAM, 200 MB hard drive, A2410 high resolution graphics card, Ethernet card, and colour monitor (or SCSI tape drive) for a limited period to $$4,998.00, compared to a combined retail price of $$8,495.00. By this time, HP had already introduced 68040 based workstations at the low end of the market, such as the HP Apollo 9000 Model 425e, available from $$5,490.00 for an 8 MB, diskless model with 19 inch greyscale monitor. In early 1992, it was reported that Commodore had appointed solution provider Applied Systems Group as the sole UK reseller of Amiga Unix. Commodore maintained claims of the platform outperforming "traditional vendors in its price bracket", also claiming to have converted numerous existing users of "Sun 4, 486 and 68000 based workstations" to the platform. Unlike Apple's A/UX compatibility layer for System 7 applications, Amiga Unix contains no compatibility layer for AmigaOS applications. Prior to the system's release, Commodore had merely indicated that the company had been "discussing" such application support. With few native applications available to take advantage of the Amiga's significant multimedia capabilities, it failed to find a niche in the competitive Unix workstation market of the early 1990s beyond certain targeted deployments. For instance, computer science students at Virginia Tech were obliged to purchase the Amiga 3000UX to pursue their studies, with students offered a base model providing 4 MB of RAM, a 100 MB hard disk, and colour monitor for around $$4,000.00. Unlike typical commercial Unix distributions of the time, Amiga Unix included the source code to the vendor specific enhancements and platform dependent device drivers (essentially any part that wasn't owned by AT&T), allowing interested users to study or enhance those parts of the system. However this source code was subject to the same license terms as the binary part of the system it was not free software. Amiga Unix also incorporated and depended upon many open source components, such as the GNU C Compiler and X Window System, and included their source code. Like many other proprietary Unix variants with small market shares, Amiga Unix vanished into the mists of computer history when its vendor, Commodore, went out of business. Today, Unix like operating systems such as Minix, NetBSD, and Linux are available for the Amiga platform.

Unsubstantiated rumours of the adoption of the Amiga 3000UX as a product by Sun Microsystems have been presented in various online venues, despite Sun already fielding a comprehensive workstation range and pursuing a technological direction that was leading the company away from Motorola's 68000 family and towards Sun's favoured SPARC architecture, describing demand for 68000 family systems as "very, very low". One instance of coverage of such rumours that appeared in contemporary print media characterised such rumours as "an amusing tidbit" with the author presciently regarding the rumoured development as unlikely. Other rumours supposedly persisted towards the beginning of 1990 that Hewlett Packard had been "negotiating to buy Commodore", only to pull out, eliciting later claims of HP workstations with "suspiciously Amiga like specifications". Such commentary was evidently oblivious to HP's existing extensive workstation ranges, including Motorola based systems, and its 1989 acquisition of Apollo Computer in pursuit of workstation market share and application support. Indeed, this acquisition led to a degree of duplication in HP's Motorola based product ranges in need of careful resolution, but brought with it numerous Apollo developers and customers. Such considerations and benefits would have been largely absent in any hypothetical Commodore acquisition.