Лассалская АЭС: Годовая выработка электроэнергии

Nuclear power plant in LaSalle County, Illinois, United States
Instead of cooling towers, the station has a man made cooling lake, which is also a popular fishery — LaSalle Lake State Fish and Wildlife Area — managed by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources. !Year
!Jan
!Feb
!Mar
!Apr
!May
!Jun
!Jul
!Aug
!Sep
!Oct
!Nov
!Dec
!Annual (Total)
|
!2001
|1,719,906
|1,430,802
|1,726,371
|1,583,577
|1,618,813
|1,656,447
|1,667,448
|1,668,346
|1,454,565
|1,305,808
|1,639,620
|1,670,311
!19,142,014
|
!2002
|1,048,320
|1,303,448
|1,737,647
|1,198,966
|1,439,437
|1,638,862
|1,671,292
|1,609,356
|1,596,064
|1,507,327
|1,465,012
|1,707,453
!17,923,184
|
!2003
|1,221,039
|955,132
|1,642,365
|1,620,797
|1,660,966
|1,651,144
|1,520,692
|1,662,598
|1,545,582
|1,699,937
|1,562,890
|1,672,837
!18,415,979
|
!2004
|1,173,865
|1,244,289
|1,708,196
|1,649,999
|1,684,687
|1,543,318
|1,670,049
|1,676,479
|1,607,626
|1,702,092
|1,637,456
|1,693,904
!18,991,960
|
!2005
|1,701,544
|924,250
|1,243,173
|1,644,514
|1,682,247
|1,606,502
|1,646,412
|1,656,701
|1,587,797
|1,666,369
|1,651,246
|1,702,903
!18,713,658
|
!2006
|1,705,138
|1,287,650
|1,200,375
|1,648,219
|1,657,791
|1,619,798
|1,660,067
|1,659,683
|1,620,205
|1,702,107
|1,648,971
|1,697,807
!19,107,811
|
!2007
|1,689,302
|1,385,889
|1,212,620
|1,651,728
|1,684,472
|1,583,910
|1,657,561
|1,652,239
|1,613,200
|1,689,614
|1,585,999
|1,573,602
!18,980,136
|
!2008
|1,481,454
|862,805
|1,653,909
|1,657,292
|1,693,554
|1,632,500
|1,668,512
|1,664,467
|1,549,476
|1,631,809
|1,662,722
|1,690,064
!18,848,564
|
!2009
|1,353,192
|1,257,652
|1,704,567
|1,658,327
|1,559,546
|1,608,575
|1,546,233
|1,547,030
|1,611,616
|1,599,877
|1,650,144
|1,711,989
!18,808,748
|
!2010
|1,683,065
|959,446
|1,523,539
|1,653,041
|1,690,466
|1,610,432
|1,645,171
|1,630,565
|1,622,345
|1,712,651
|1,674,488
|1,727,359
!19,132,568
|
!2011
|1,724,944
|829,924
|1,516,381
|1,682,247
|1,699,146
|1,654,166
|1,675,592
|1,669,504
|1,657,000
|1,729,051
|1,687,055
|1,731,350
!19,256,360
|
!2012
|1,734,597
|1,147,439
|1,510,841
|1,683,211
|1,712,903
|1,647,891
|1,676,551
|1,689,868
|1,645,273
|1,736,682
|1,686,082
|1,723,661
!19,594,999
|
!2013
|1,674,324
|1,025,207
|1,621,003
|954,261
|1,695,877
|1,654,763
|1,690,566
|1,691,404
|1,608,025
|1,726,399
|1,689,718
|1,728,614
!18,760,161
|
!2014
|1,737,287
|1,007,668
|1,683,666
|1,568,452
|1,526,053
|1,652,096
|1,701,950
|1,334,903
|1,651,161
|1,458,474
|1,692,554
|1,740,435
!18,754,699
|
!2015
|1,746,319
|815,034
|1,252,039
|1,684,221
|1,673,159
|1,621,874
|1,683,599
|1,432,598
|1,618,308
|1,732,702
|1,686,399
|1,740,117
!18,686,369
|
!2016
|1,721,346
|1,172,859
|1,170,724
|1,680,679
|1,721,455
|1,522,004
|1,682,991
|1,676,233
|1,641,904
|1,727,089
|1,684,284
|1,742,512
!19,144,080
|
!2017
|1,652,790
|745,024
|1,477,284
|1,681,581
|1,726,287
|1,443,848
|1,686,930
|1,692,181
|1,643,335
|1,728,664
|1,689,473
|1,741,062
!18,908,459
|
!2018
|1,744,824
|1,273,899
|1,226,979
|1,680,521
|1,708,708
|1,640,803
|1,682,316
|1,680,977
|1,554,530
|1,730,644
|1,687,094
|1,734,471
!19,345,766
|
!2019
|1,684,758
|1,191,576
|1,446,068
|1,683,785
|1,729,058
|1,651,282
|1,671,185
|1,687,784
|1,644,067
|1,728,685
|1,689,639
|1,627,368
!19,435,255
|
!2020
|1,691,513
|1,064,030
|1,739,345
|1,683,521
|1,719,077
|1,645,874
|1,661,558
|1,681,468
|1,649,862
|1,732,431
|1,685,939
|1,741,066
!19,695,684
|
!2021
|1,710,653
|1,300,131
|865,774
|1,127,508
|1,718,562
|1,639,674
|1,677,899
|1,677,296
|1,643,350
|1,721,082
|1,682,391
|1,740,425
!18,504,745
|
!2022
|1,694,657
|1,285,946
|1,247,406
|1,681,422
|1,722,403
|1,647,885
|1,623,009
|1,689,630
|1,493,362
|1,702,973
|
|
!15,788,693
|
!2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
! |}

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of 10 mile (16 km), concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about 50 mile (80 km), concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity. The 2010 U. S. population within 10 mile (16 km) of LaSalle was 17,643, an increase of 7.1 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U. S. Census data for msnbc. com. The 2010 U. S. population within 50 mile (80 km) was 1,902,775, an increase of 22.6 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Joliet (34 miles to city center).

On February 20, 2006, a "site area emergency" was declared at the plant at 12:28 AM. This was the first SAE declared at a US nuclear plant since 1991. Workers were shutting down Unit 1 for refueling when the plant's turbine control system malfunctioned, SCRAMing the reactor. The reactor had been operating at 6 percent power output at the time. Plant instruments indicated three of 185 control rods used to shut down the reactor were not fully inserted triggering the emergency declaration. After a reset, the plant's instruments indicated that only one control rod was not fully inserted, not three. The emergency ended at 4:27 AM with no damage or release of radioactivity. Post trip evaluations have confirmed that all control rods were fully inserted within four minutes of the reactor SCRAM. A review indicates the problem was with the indication sensors, and that all control rods were fully inserted immediately at the time of the reactor scram. Follow up evaluations also demonstrated that even if the three subject control rods remained fully withdrawn in a cold shutdown condition, the reactor would have remained adequately shutdown.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at LaSalle was 1 in 357,143, according to an NRC study published in August 2010.