Международная ассоциация по изучению сект и деструктивных культов

Anti cult organization

The International Cultic Studies Association (ICSA) is a non profit educational and anti cult organization. It publishes the International Journal of Coercion, Abuse, and Manipulation, "ICSA Today", and other materials.

ICSA was founded in 1979 in Massachusetts as the American Family Foundation (AFF) – one of several dozen disparate parents' groups founded in the late 1970s by concerned parents. For a time it was affiliated with the Citizens’ Freedom Foundation (CFF) which later became the Cult Awareness Network (CAN). It also developed links with Christian counter cult movements such as the Christian Research Institute.

In 1984, the American Family Foundation's early print magazine, The Advisor, was replaced by the Cult Observer and the Cultic Studies Journal.

In 2001, publication of the Cultic Studies Journal ceased, and the AFF began publishing the Cultic Studies Review as an online journal with triennial print editions. In 2005, the final AFF published edition of Cultic Studies Review was released. Subsequent editions were published by the International Cultic Studies Association until 2010.

In 2010, the first print and online editions of the International Journal of Cultic Studies (IJCS) were published online, as a self described "refereed annual journal that publishes scholarly research on cultic phenomena across a range of disciplines and professions". Former Australian MP Stephen Mutch has served on the journal's editorial board.

Bryan Edelman and James T. Richardson state that China has borrowed heavily from Western anti cult movements, such as ICSA, to bolster their view of non mainstream religious groups, and so the support campaigns of oppression against them. In a previous article Richardson and Marat S. Shterin said that Western anti cult organizations, including the CSA, had been a source of anti cult material in Russia.

In their book Cults and New Religions: A Brief History, sociologists Douglas E. Cowan and David G. Bromley describe the ICSA as a "secular anticult" organization. They claim that the ICSA provides no indication of how many of its cult characteristics are necessary for a group to be considered "cultic," and that the checklist creators do not adequately define how much of certain practices or behaviors would constitute "excessive," nor do they provide evidence that any of the practices listed are innately harmful. Cowan and Bromley also allege that the ICSA’s list is so broad that even mainstream religious movements such as Buddhism, Evangelical Protestantism, Hinduism, and the Roman Catholic Church could fall within the criteria.