1,3-Дипольдік цикл қосылу реакциясы

A type of pericyclic chemical reaction

The 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition is a chemical reaction between a 1,3 dipole and a dipolarophile to form a five membered ring. The earliest 1,3 dipolar cycloadditions were described in the late 19th century to the early 20th century, following the discovery of 1,3 dipoles. Mechanistic investigation and synthetic application were established in the 1960s, primarily through the work of Rolf Huisgen. Hence, the reaction is sometimes referred to as the Huisgen cycloaddition (this term is often used to specifically describe the 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition between an organic azide and an alkyne to generate 1,2,3 triazole). 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition is an important route to the regio and stereoselective synthesis of five membered heterocycles and their ring opened acyclic derivatives. The dipolarophile is typically an alkene or alkyne, but can be other pi systems. When the dipolarophile is an alkyne, aromatic rings are generally produced.

Originally two proposed mechanisms describe the 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition: first, the concerted pericyclic cycloaddition mechanism, proposed by Rolf Huisgen; and second, the stepwise mechanism involving a diradical intermediate, proposed by Firestone. After much debate, the former proposal is now generally accepted—the 1,3 dipole reacts with the dipolarophile in a concerted, often asynchronous, and symmetry allowed π4s + π2s fashion through a thermal six electron Huckel aromatic transition state. However, a few examples exist of a stepwise mechanism for the catalyst free 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition reactions of thiocarbonyl ylides, and nitrile oxides

Huisgen investigated a series of cycloadditions between the 1,3 dipolar diazo compounds and various dipolarophilic alkenes. 1,3 Dipoles containing higher row elements such as sulfur or phosphorus are also known, but are utilized less routinely. Resonance structures can be drawn to delocalize both negative and positive charges onto any terminus of a 1,3 dipole (see the scheme below). A more accurate method to describe the electronic distribution on a 1,3 dipole is to assign the major resonance contributor based on experimental or theoretical data, such as dipole moment measurements or computations. For example, diazomethane bears the largest negative character at the terminal nitrogen atom, while hydrazoic acid bears the largest negative character at the internal nitrogen atom. Consequently, this ambivalence means that the ends of a 1,3 dipole can be treated as both nucleophilic and electrophilic at the same time. The extent of nucleophilicity and electrophilicity at each end can be evaluated using the frontier molecular orbitals, which can be obtained computationally. In general, the atom that carries the largest orbital coefficient in the HOMO acts as the nucleophile, whereas that in the LUMO acts as the electrophile. The most nucleophilic atom is usually, but not always, the most electron rich atom. In 1,3 dipolar cycloadditions, identity of the dipole dipolarophile pair determines whether the HOMO or the LUMO character of the 1,3 dipole will dominate (see discussion on frontier molecular orbitals below).

The most commonly used dipolarophiles are alkenes and alkynes. Heteroatom containing dipolarophiles such as carbonyls and imines can also undergo 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition. Other examples of dipolarophiles include fullerenes and nanotubes, which can undergo 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition with azomethine ylide in the Prato reaction.

1,3 Dipolar cycloadditions experience very little solvent effect because both the reactants and the transition states are generally non polar. For example, the rate of reaction between phenyl diazomethane and ethyl acrylate or norbornene (see scheme below) changes only slightly upon varying solvents from cyclohexane to methanol. Lack of solvent effects in 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition is clearly demonstrated in the reaction between enamines and dimethyl diazomalonate (see scheme below). The polar reaction, N cyclopentenyl pyrrolidine nucleophilic addition to the diazo compound, proceeds 1,500 times faster in polar DMSO than in non polar decalin. On the other hand, a close analog of this reaction, N cyclohexenyl pyrrolidine 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition to dimethyl diazomalonate, is sped up only 41 fold in DMSO relative to decalin.

1,3 Dipolar cycloadditions are pericyclic reactions, which obey the Dewar Zimmerman rules and the Woodward–Hoffmann rules. In the Dewar Zimmerman treatment, the reaction proceeds through a 5 center, zero node, 6 electron Huckel transition state for this particular molecular orbital diagram. However, each orbital can be randomly assigned a sign to arrive at the same result. In the Woodward–Hoffmann treatment, frontier molecular orbitals (FMO) of the 1,3 dipole and the dipolarophile overlap in the symmetry allowed π4s + π2s manner. Such orbital overlap can be achieved in three ways: type I, II and III. The dominant pathway is the one which possesses the smallest HOMO LUMO energy gap.

The dipole has a high lying HOMO which overlaps with LUMO of the dipolarophile. A dipole of this class is referred to as a HOMO controlled dipole or a nucleophilic dipole, which includes azomethine ylide, carbonyl ylide, nitrile ylide, azomethine imine, carbonyl imine and diazoalkane. These dipoles add to electrophilic alkenes readily. Electron withdrawing groups (EWG) on the dipolarophile would accelerate the reaction by lowering the LUMO, while electron donating groups (EDG) would decelerate the reaction by raising the HOMO. For example, the reactivity scale of diazomethane against a series of dipolarophiles is shown in the scheme below. Diazomethane reacts with the electron poor ethyl acrylate more than a million times faster than the electron rich butyl vinyl ether. This type resembles the normal electron demand Diels Alder reaction, in which the diene HOMO combines with the dienophile LUMO.

HOMO of the dipole can pair with LUMO of the dipolarophile; alternatively, HOMO of the dipolarophile can pair with LUMO of the dipole. This two way interaction arises because the energy gap in either direction is similar. A dipole of this class is referred to as a HOMO LUMO controlled dipole or an ambiphilic dipole, which includes nitrile imide, nitrone, carbonyl oxide, nitrile oxide, and azide. Any substituent on the dipolarophile would accelerate the reaction by lowering the energy gap between the two interacting orbitals; i. e., an EWG would lower the LUMO while an EDG would raise the HOMO. For example, azides react with various electron rich and electron poor dipolarophile with similar reactivities (see reactivity scale below).

The dipole has a low lying LUMO which overlaps with HOMO of the dipolarophile (indicated by red dashed lines in the diagram). A dipole of this class is referred to as a LUMO controlled dipole or an electrophilic dipole, which includes nitrous oxide and ozone. EWGs on the dipolarophile decelerate the reaction, while EDGs accelerate the reaction. For example, ozone reacts with the electron rich 2 methylpropene about 100,000 times faster than the electron poor tetrachloroethene (see reactivity scale below). This type resembles the inverse electron demand Diels Alder reaction, in which the diene LUMO combines with the dienophile HOMO.

Concerted processes such as the 1,3 cycloaddition require a highly ordered transition state (high negative entropy of activation) and only moderate enthalpy requirements. Using competition reaction experiments, relative rates of addition for different cycloaddition reactions have been found to offer general findings on factors in reactivity. Conjugation, especially with aromatic groups, increases the rate of reaction by stabilization of the transition state. During the transition, the two sigma bonds are being formed at different rates, which may generate partial charges in the transition state that can be stabilized by charge distribution into conjugated substituents. More polarizable dipolarophiles are more reactive because diffuse electron clouds are better suited to initiate the flow of electrons. Dipolarophiles with high angular strain are more reactive due to increased energy of the ground state. Increased steric hindrance in the transition state as a result of unhindered reactants dramatically lowers the reaction rate. Hetero dipolarophiles add more slowly, if at all, compared to C,C diapolarophiles due to a lower gain in sigma bond energy to offset the loss of a pi bond during the transition state. Isomerism of the dipolarophile affects reaction rate due to sterics. trans isomers are more reactive (trans stilbene will add diphenyl(nitrile imide) 27 times faster than cis stilbene) because during the reaction, the 120° bond angle shrinks to 109°, bringing eclipsing cis substituents towards each other for increased steric clash.

1,3 dipolar cycloadditions usually result in retention of configuration with respect to both the 1,3 dipole and the dipolarophile. Such high degree of stereospecificity is a strong support for the concerted over the stepwise reaction mechanisms. As mentioned before, many examples show that the reactions were stepwise, thus, presenting partial or no stereospecificity.

cis Substituents on the dipolarophilic alkene end up cis, and trans substituents end up trans in the resulting five membered cyclic compound (see scheme below).

Generally, the stereochemistry of the dipole is not of major concern because only few dipoles could form stereogenic centers, and resonance structures allow bond rotation which scrambles the stereochemistry. However, the study of azomethine ylides has verified that cycloaddition is also stereospecific with respect to the dipole component. Diastereopure azomethine ylides are generated by electrocyclic ring opening of aziridines, and then rapidly trapped with strong dipolarophiles before bond rotation can take place (see scheme below). If weaker dipolarophiles are used, bonds in the dipole have the chance to rotate, resulting in impaired cycloaddition stereospecificity. These results altogether confirm that 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition is stereospecific, giving retention of both the 1,3 dipole and the dipolarophile.

When two or more stereocenters are generated during the reaction, diastereomeric transition states and products can be obtained. In the Diels Alder cycloaddition, the endo diastereoselectivity due to secondary orbital interactions is usually observed. In 1,3 dipolar cycloadditions, however, two forces influence the diastereoselectivity: the attractive π interaction (resembling secondary orbital interactions in the Diels Alder cycloaddition) and the repulsive steric interaction. Unfortunately, these two forces often cancel each other, causing poor diastereoselection in 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition. Examples of substrate controlled diastereoselective 1,3 dipolar cycloadditions are shown below. First is the reaction between and methyl acrylate. In the transition state, the phenyl and the methyl ester groups stack to give the cis substitution as the exclusive final pyrroline product. This favorable π interaction offsets the steric repulsion between the phenyl and the methyl ester groups. Second is the reaction between nitrone and dihydrofuran. The exo selectivity is achieved to minimize steric repulsion. Last is the intramolecular azomethine ylide reaction with alkene. The diastereoselectivity is controlled by the formation of a less strained cis fused ring system.

Trajectory of the cycloaddition can be controlled to achieve a diastereoselective reaction. For example, metals can chelate to the dipolarophile and the incoming dipole and direct the cycloaddition selectively on one face. The example below shows addition of nitrile oxide to an enantiomerically pure allyl alcohol in the presence of a magnesium ion. The most stable conformation of the alkene places the hydroxyl group above the plane of the alkene. The magnesium then chelates to the hydroxyl group and the oxygen atom of nitrile oxide. The cycloaddition thus comes from the top face selectively. Such diastereodirection has been applied in the synthesis of epothilones.

For asymmetric dipole dipolarophile pairs, two regioisomeric products are possible. Both electronic/stereoelectronic and steric factors contribute to the regioselectivity of 1,3 dipolar cycloadditions.

The dominant electronic interaction is the combination between the largest HOMO and the largest LUMO. Therefore, regioselectivity is governed by the atoms that bear the largest orbital HOMO and LUMO coefficients. For example, consider the cycloaddition of diazomethane to three dipolarophiles: methyl acrylate, styrene or methyl cinnamate. The carbon of diazomethane bears the largest HOMO, while the end olefinic carbons of methyl acrylate and styrene bear the largest LUMO. Hence, cycloaddition gives the substitution at the C 3 position regioselectively. For methyl cinnamate, the two substituents (Ph v. s. COOMe) compete at withdrawing electrons from the alkene. The carboxyl is the better electron withdrawing group, causing the β carbon to be most electrophilic. Thus, cycloaddition yields the carboxyl group on C 3 and the phenyl group on C 4 regioselectively.

Steric effects can either cooperate or compete with the aforementioned electronic effects. Sometimes steric effects completely outweighs the electronic preference, giving the opposite regioisomer exclusively. For example, diazomethane generally adds to methyl acrylate to give 3 carboxyl pyrazoline. However, by putting more steric demands into the system, we start to observe the isomeric 4 carboxyl pyrazolines. The ratio of these two regioisomers depends on the steric demands. At the extreme, increasing the size from hydrogen to t butyl shifts the regioselectivity from 100% 3 carboxyl to 100% 4 carboxyl substitution.

1,3 dipolar cycloadditions are important ways toward the synthesis of many important 5 membered heterocycles such as triazoles, furans, isoxazoles, pyrrolidines, and others. Additionally, some cycloadducts can be cleaved to reveal the linear skeleton, providing another route toward the synthesis of aliphatic compounds. These reactions are tremendously useful also because they are stereospecific, diastereoselective and regioselective. Several examples are provided below.

1,3 dipolar cycloaddition with nitrile oxides is a widely used masked aldol reaction. Cycloaddition between a nitrile oxide and an alkene yields the cyclic isoxazoline product, whereas the reaction with an alkyne yields the isoxazole. Both isoxazolines and isoxazoles can be cleaved by hydrogenation to reveal aldol type β hydroxycarbonyl or Claisen type β dicarbonyl products, respectively. Nitrile oxide alkyne cycloaddition followed by hydrogenation was utilized in the synthesis of Miyakolide as illustrated in the figure below.

1,3 dipolar cycloaddition reactions have emerged as powerful tools in the synthesis of complex cyclic scaffolds and molecules for medicinal, biological, and mechanistic studies. Among them, [3+2] cycloaddition reactions involving carbonyl ylides have extensively been employed to generate oxygen containing five membered cyclic molecules.

Ylides are regarded as positively charged heteroatoms connected to negatively charged carbon atoms, which include ylides of sulfonium, thiocarbonyl, oxonium, nitrogen, and carbonyl. Several methods exist for generating carbonyl ylides, which are necessary intermediates for generating oxygen containing five membered ring structures, for [3+2] cycloaddition reactions.

One of the earliest examples of carbonyl ylide synthesis involves photocatalysis. Photolysis of diazotetrakis(trifluoromethyl)cyclopentadiene* (DTTC) in the presence of tetramethylurea can generate the carbonyl ylide by an intermolecular nucleophilic attack and subsequent aromatization of the DTTC moiety. Dideuteriodiazomethane was photolysed in the presence of formaldehyde to generate the dideuterioformaldehyde carbonyl ylide.

Carbonyl ylides can be synthesized by acid catalysis of hydroxy 3 pyrones in the absence of a metal catalyst. An initial tautomerization occurs, followed by elimination of the leaving group to aromatize the pyrone ring and to generate the carbonyl ylide. A cycloaddition reaction with a dipolarophile lastly forms the oxacycle. This approach is less widely employed due to its limited utility and requirement for pyrone skeletons. 5 hydroxy 4 pyrones can also be used to synthesize carbonyl ylides by an intramolecular hydrogen transfer. After hydrogen transfer, the carbonyl ylide can then react with dipolarophiles to form oxygen containing rings.

Dihalocarbenes have also been employed to generate carbonyl ylides, exploiting the electron withdrawing nature of dihalocarbenes. Both phenyl(trichloromethyl)mercury and phenyl(tribromomethyl)mercury are sources dichlorocarbenes and dibromocarbenes, respectively. The carbonyl ylide can be generated upon reaction of the dihalocarbenes with ketones or aldehydes. However, the synthesis of α halocarbonyl ylides can also undesirably lead to the loss of carbon monoxide and the generation of the deoxygenation product.

A universal approach for generating carbonyl ylides involves metal catalysis of α diazocarbonyl compounds, generally in the presence of dicopper or dirhodium catalysts. After release of nitrogen gas and conversion to the metallocarbene, an intermolecular reaction with a carbonyl group can generate the carbonyl ylide. Subsequent cycloaddition reaction with an alkene or alkyne dipolarophile can afford oxygen containing five membered rings. Popular catalysts that give modest yields towards synthesizing oxacycles include Rh2(OAc)4 and Cu(acac)2.

The universality and extensive use of 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition reactions mediated by metal catalysis of diazocarbonyl molecules, for synthesizing oxygen containing five membered rings, has spurred significant interest into its mechanism. Several groups have investigated the mechanism to expand the scope of synthetic molecules with respect to regio and stereo selectivity. However, due to the high turn over frequencies of these reactions, the intermediates and mechanism remains elusive. The generally accepted mechanism, developed by characterization of stable ruthenium carbenoid complexes and rhodium metallocarbenes, involves an initial formation of a metal carbenoid complex from the diazo compound. Elimination of nitrogen gas then affords a metallocarbene. An intramolecular nucleophilic attack by the carbonyl oxygen regenerates the metal catalyst and forms the carbonyl ylide. The carbonyl ylide can then react with an alkene or alkyne, such as dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (DMAD) to generate the oxacycle. However, it is uncertain whether the metallocarbene intermediate generates the carbonyl ylide. In some cases, metallocarbenes can also react directly with dipolarophiles. In these cases, the metallocarbene, such as the dirhodium(II)tetracarboxylate carbene, is stabilized through hyperconjugative metal enolate type interactions. Subsequent 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition reaction occurs through a transient metal complexed carbonyl ylide. Therefore, a persistent metallocarbene can influence the stereoselectivity and regioselectivity of the 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition reaction based on the stereochemistry and size of the metal ligands. The mechanism of the 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition reaction between the carbonyl ylide dipole and alkynyl or alkenyl dipolarophiles has been extensively investigated with respect to regioselectivity and stereoselectivity. As symmetric dipolarophiles have one orientation for cycloaddition, only one regioisomer, but multiple stereoisomers can be obtained.

Regioselectivity of 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition reactions between carbonyl ylide dipoles and alkynyl or alkenyl dipolarophiles is essential for generating molecules with defined regiochemistry. FMO theory and analysis of the HOMO LUMO energy gaps between the dipole and dipolarophile can rationalize and predict the regioselectivity of experimental outcomes. The HOMOs and LUMOs can belong to either the dipole or dipolarophile, for which HOMOdipole LUMOdipolarophile or HOMOdipolarophile LUMOdipole interactions can exist. Overlap of the orbitals with the largest coefficients can ultimately rationalize and predict results. The archetypal regioselectivity of the 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition reaction mediated by carbonyl ylide dipoles has been examined by Padwa and coworkers. Using a Rh2(OAc)4 catalyst in benzene, diazodione underwent a 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition reaction with methyl propiolate and methyl propargyl ether. The reaction with methyl propiolate affords two regioisomers with the major resulting from the HOMOdipole LUMOdipolarophile interaction, which has the largest coefficients on the carbon proximal to the carbonyl group of the carbonyl ylide and on the methyl propiolate terminal alkyne carbon. The reaction with methyl propargyl ether affords one regioisomer resulting from the HOMOdipolarophile LUMOdipole interaction, which has largest coefficients on the carbon distal to the carbonyl group of the carbonyl ylide and on the methyl propargyl ether terminal alkyne carbon. Regioselectivities of 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition reactions mediated by metal catalysis of diazocarbonyl compounds may also be influenced by the metal through formation of stable metallocarbenes. Stabilization of the metallocarbene, via metal enolate type interactions, will prevent the formation of carbonyl ylides, resulting in a direct reaction between the metallocarbene dipole and an alkynyl or alkenyl dipolarophile (see image of The dirhodium(II)tetracarboxylate metallocarbene stabilized by πC Rh→πC=O hyperconjugation.). In this situation, the metal ligands will influence the regioselectivity and stereoselectivity of the 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition reaction.

The stereoselectivity of 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition reactions between carbonyl ylide dipoles and alkenyl dipolarophiles has also been closely examined. For alkynyl dipolarophiles, stereoselectivity is not an issue as relatively planar sp2 carbons are formed, while regioselectivity must be considered (see image of the Products of the 1,3 Dipolar Cycloaddition Reaction Between Carbonyl Ylide Dipoles and Alkenyl or Alkynyl Dipolarophiles). However, for alkenyl dipolarophiles, both regioselectivity and stereoselectivity must be considered as sp3 carbons are generated in the product species. 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition reactions between carbonyl ylide dipoles and alkenyl dipolarophiles can generate diastereomeric products. Reactions with just the metal catalyst Rh2(OAc)4 prefer the exo product while reactions with the additional Lewis acid Yb(OTf)3 prefer the endo product. The endo selectivity observed for Lewis acid cycloaddition reactions is attributed to the optimized orbital overlap of the carbonyl π systems between the dipolarophile coordinated by Yb(Otf)3 (LUMO) and the dipole (HOMO). After many investigations, two primary approaches for influencing the stereoselectivity of carbonyl ylide cycloadditions have been developed that exploit the chirality of metal catalysts and Lewis acids. This is a result of the chiral metal catalyst remaining associated with the carbonyl ylide during the cycloaddition, which confers facial selectivity. However, the exact mechanisms are not yet fully understood. The second approach employs a chiral Lewis acid catalyst to induce facial stereoselectivity after the generation of the carbonyl ylide using an achiral metal catalyst. The chiral Lewis acid catalyst is believed to coordinate to the dipolarophile, which lowers the LUMO of the dipolarophile while also leading to enantioselectivity.

1,3 Dipolar cycloaddition between an azomethine ylide and an alkene furnishes an azacyclic structure, such as pyrrolidine. This strategy has been applied to the synthesis of spirotryprostatin A.

Ozonolysis is a very important organic reaction. Alkenes and alkynes can be cleaved by ozonolysis to give aldehyde, ketone or carboxylic acid products.

The 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition between organic azides and terminal alkynes (i. e., the Huisgen cycloaddition) has been widely utilized for bioconjugation.

The Huisgen reaction generally does not proceed readily under mild conditions. Meldal et al. and Sharpless et al. independently developed a copper(I) catalyzed version of the Huisgen reaction, CuAAC (for Copper catalyzed Azide Alkyne Cycloaddition), which proceeds very readily in mild, including physiological, conditions (neutral pH, room temperature and water solution). This reaction is also bioorthogonal: azides and alkynes are both generally absent from biological systems and therefore these functionalities can be chemoselectively reacted even in the cellular context. They also do not react with other functional groups found in nature, so they do not perturb biological systems. The reaction is so versatile that it is termed the "Click" chemistry. Although copper(I) is toxic, many protective ligands have been developed to both reduce cytotoxicity and improve rate of CuAAC, allowing it to be used in in vivo studies. For example, Bertozzi et al. reported the metabolic incorporation of azide functionalized saccharides into the glycan of the cell membrane, and subsequent labeling with fluorophore alkyne conjugate. The result is that the cell membrane is fluorescently labeled, and can therefore be imaged using a fluorescence microscope.

To avoid toxicity of copper(I), Bertozzi et al. developed the strain promoted azide alkyne cycloaddition (SPAAC) between organic azide and strained cyclooctyne. The angle distortion of the cyclooctyne helps to speed up the reaction by both reducing the activation strain and enhancing the interactions, thereby enabling it to be used in physiological conditions without the need for the catalyst. For instance, Ting et al. introduced an azido functionality onto specific proteins on the cell surface using a ligase enzyme. The azide tagged protein is then labeled with cyclooctyne fluorophore conjugate to yield a fluorescently labeled protein.