Жүдай Аристобул I: Хасмонейлер әулетінің бірінші патшасы және бас жұбанысы

Judah Aristobulus I or Aristobulus I (,/æ//r//ᵻ//s//t//ə/'/b//j//uː//l//ə//s/; Ἀριστόβουλος) was the High Priest of Israel and the first Hasmonean king of Judaea, reigning from 104 BCE until his death the following year. He was the eldest of the five sons of John Hyrcanus, the previous leader. The Roman–Jewish historian Josephus states that he was the first Jew in "four hundred and eighty three years and three months" to have established a monarchy since the return from the Babylonian captivity. Aristobulus was the first Hebrew king to claim both the high priesthood and the kingship. The Sadducees and the Essenes were not concerned about Aristobulus taking the title of king, but the Pharisees, believing that the kingship could only be held by the descendants of the Davidic line, strongly opposed this. They launched a massive rebellion, but Aristobulus died before any attempt to depose him could be made. The major sources on Aristobulus's life from antiquity are Josephus's Wars of the Jews and Antiquities of the Jews. His reign is particularly noted for the Judaization of Galilee and the native Semitic people called Ituraeans. Josephus, quoting from Strabo's Historica Hypomnemata, described Aristobulus's regime as kindly and "very serviceable to the Jews" on account of his conquests and the integration of "a portion of Ituraean nation whom he joined to them by the bond of circumcision".

The name Aristobulus is of Greek origin and is an epithet meaning "best advising". Aristobulus I was the first Hasmonean to have adopted the name, but his Hebrew name was Judah. He was also referred to as Philhellene, meaning he was an admirer of Greek culture. Josephus though does not explain why he was called this.

Aristobulus and his brother Antigonus were entrusted by their father, John Hyrcanus, with the conquest of Samaria. They laid siege to the city and, when the inhabitants requested aid from the Seleucid Empire, defeated a relief army led by Antiochus IX Cyzicenus. Antiochus successfully escaped to Scythopolis, but the brothers captured Samaria towards the end of John's reign, razing the city and enslaving its inhabitants. Their forces subsequently captured Scythopolis and the entire region south of Mount Carmel. According to John Hyrcanus's instructions, the country was to be placed in the hands of his wife after his death, and Aristobulus was originally to receive only the high priesthood. Instead, Aristobulus had his mother imprisoned, where she starved to death, thereby securing for himself both the high priesthood and the kingship. He then imprisoned all of his brothers, except for Antigonus, to protect himself from possible familial retaliation. Josephus does not name Hyrcanus's wife. He states that Aristobulus and Antigonus were the eldest of the five brothers, but that Aristobulus was the firstborn. The other three were Alexander Jannaeus, Absalom, and a fifth brother, whom Josephus mentions but does not name.

Aristobulus had gone to war against the Ituraeans and taken territory from them. The conquered Ituraeans were compelled to accept Jewish law and circumcision in order to remain on their land. The Ituraeans had been an Arab tribe that expanded southwards from the Lebanese Beq'a into the Golan Heights and Mount Hermon in the fourth century BCE following the collapse of the Seleucid Empire. They are first mentioned in Josephus's Antiquities 13.319 during Aristobulus I's conquest where Josephus writes, "he brought over to them a portion of the Ituraean nation". Josephus's Antiquities 13.319 is a quote from Strabo's Historica Hypomnemata which was originally written by Timagenes stating "This man was a kindly person and very serviceable to the Jews, for he acquired additional territory for them, and brought over to them a portion of the Ituraean nation, whom he joined to them by the bond of circumcision." This passage has been generally accepted as evidence for Josephus's reliance on Strabo and Timagenes's writings. The exact location of the confrontation and the territory that the Ituraeans occupied is unknown. Most scholars assume the Ituraean territory to be northern Galilee. There is also no evidence of forced Judaization in Galilee during Aristobulus's reign.

With sudden abdominal pains, Aristobulus's health gradually deteriorated, compelling him to return to his palace during the Sukkot festival. His brother Antigonus would eventually return to Jerusalem to celebrate the festival at the Temple. Unfamiliar with ceremonial festivities, Antigonus arrived armed with escorting soldiers. According to Kenneth Atkinson, Antigonus had returned from a successful, unspecified military campaign. He further states that Josephus did not mention the location of the campaign. Atkinson presumes it to be Galilee since Antigonus had fine armor and military decorations procured in the region, as stated in Josephus's Jewish War 1.76. In his morbid state, Aristobulus fell prey to the factious influence of his wife, Queen Salome Alexandra, and conspirators; they had spread rumors about Antigonus attempting to seize the throne once he was seen in armor at the festival. Wearing a military uniform was considered unorthodox during the occasion, and Aristobulus became estranged from Antigonus after he heard this rumor. Aristobulus was then informed by "evil men" that his brother was sending soldiers to murder him. Believing the report, he barricaded himself in the fortified citadel Baris, which was moated and had defensive towers.

The Queen, contemplating the possibility of being tortured and killed if Antigonus became king once Aristobulus was deceased from his deteriorating health, deliberately advised Antigonus to enter, armed, into a meeting with his brother. However, he had been summoned to address suspicions of conspiracy against his brother's life. The Queen had bribed the messenger whom Aristobulus sent to his brother; she altered the original message. Instead of having Antigonus arrive at his brother's palace unarmed, she suggested that Antigonus should wear his new body armor which he had made in Galilee as a presentation upon Aristobulus's request. Incensed with suspicion at finding his brother armed, Aristobulus killed his brother. In frantic regret at this rash execution, Aristobulus's health drastically declined until his death shortly thereafter. Queen Salome then released Aristobulus's brothers, selecting Alexander Jannaeus as the next king.

The minting of Hasmonean coins did not commence until the leadership of John Hyrcanus. Like his father, Judah Aristobulus minted his coins solely with the title of the high priesthood, using Hebrew inscriptions. It was not until Alexander Jannaeus that both the roles of kingship and the high priesthood were minted onto the coins. The majority of Judah's coins were discovered in the regions of Galilee and the Golan, primarily, the largest quantity of coins originated from Gamla. By 2016, archaeologists had unearthed thirty coins at Gamla, which was the largest quantity to date. The majority of these coins were minted during his actual reign, while a small number were minted afterwards. The numismatic evidence does not suggest that Aristobulus assumed the title of king. There was also the possibility that the coins could be attributed to Aristobulus II (67 – 63 BCE), who was also a king and high priest. However, the longstanding debate began to lean more towards Aristobulus I when new numismatic evidence indicated that Aristobulus I had his coins minted with the name "Judah". Due to his short reign of one year, only a small number of coins bearing the name "Judah" are available. Ya'akov Meshorer categorized them into two groups. Twenty coins are inscribed with "Jehudah high priest and the assembly of the Jews" (יהודה כהן גדול וחבר היהודים), and another seven with the inscriptions of "Jehudah the high priest and the assembly of the Jews" (יהודה הכהן הגדל וחבר היהדים). Each coin has a value of one prutah and bears the inscriptions in a wreath. On the opposite side, there is a cornucopia with pomegranates between them. The inscriptions on his coins are almost identical to those on the coins of his father and his brother, Alexander Jannaeus. Doubts concerning Josephus's assertion that Aristobulus was the first Hasmonean monarch are indicated by his coins, which do not contain the title of "king". Josephus's statement also conflicts with Strabo, who stated that Alexander Jannaeus was the first king, rather than a high priest. However, no Hasmonean relinquished the high priesthood in favor of the kingship. According to Kenneth Atkinson, Alexander Jannaeus faced opposition for having the kingship title minted onto his coins. Alexander had many of those coins overstruck to replace the kingship title with the high priesthood. Atkinson considers the overstruck coins as evidence that the title of "king" was still problematic during Alexander's reign. Atkinson concluded that "the absence of any royal designation on Aristobulus's coins does not indicate that he was never an actual monarch".

The brief yet impactful reign of Aristobulus I left a lasting imprint on the Hasmonean dynasty, sparking historical debates about his true status as a monarch. While Josephus asserts that Aristobulus was the first Hasmonean king, numismatic evidence complicates this claim. The coins minted during Aristobulus's rule do not bear the title of "king," fueling doubts about his royal status. This discrepancy aligns with conflicting accounts from Strabo, who credits Alexander Jannaeus as the inaugural Hasmonean king. The enduring debate hinges on the intricacies of Hasmonean leadership, with scholars pondering whether Aristobulus held both the high priesthood and kingship simultaneously. The absence of the royal designation on his coins, reminiscent of the later hesitancy seen in Alexander Jannaeus's reign, adds a layer of complexity to understanding the political dynamics within the Hasmonean rule.

The dual assertion of high priesthood and kingship by Aristobulus I not only fueled debates among historians but also heightened religious tensions during his reign. The Pharisees, staunch believers in the Davidic lineage as the rightful kings, vehemently opposed Aristobulus's claims to the throne. This ideological conflict resulted in a massive rebellion initiated by the Pharisees, seeking to depose Aristobulus. However, his untimely death pre empted any resolution to this religious and political turmoil. The clash between traditionalist Pharisees and the Hasmonean monarch set the stage for subsequent power struggles within the Jewish community, contributing to the complex socio political landscape of the time. Thus, the legacy of Aristobulus I extends beyond the numismatic uncertainties, encompassing the intricate interplay between religious convictions and political ambitions that characterized this pivotal period in Judean history.