1776 (boardgame)

1974 board game

1776, subtitled "The Game of the American Revolutionary War", is a board wargame published by Avalon Hill in 1974 that simulates the American Revolutionary War. Its release was timed to coincide with the bicentenary of the Revolution, and for several years was a bestseller for Avalon Hill.

1776 is a two player wargame that contains elements of both strategy and tactical combat. It contains a campaign game plus four scenarios covering the invasion of Canada, the Saratoga campaign, Greene's Southern campaign, and the Yorktown campaign.

In Issue 29 of Games & Puzzles, the game review panel noted that this was six games in one box: the Basic game, the four Advanced scenarios, and the overall Campaign game. The panel awarded the game an above average rating of 5 out of 6, saying, "For those who enjoy this form of activity, this game has a great deal to offer." In Issue 8 of Phoenix, Paul Hirst compared 1776 to The American Revolution: 1775 1783 by Simulations Publications Inc., and concluded, "both games achieve a realistic simulation of the revolutionary war. Both however, are less than complete [ ] For simplicity and overall strategic clarity, American Revolution is the winner. For a detailed involved game, with tactical overtones 1776 is superior." In his 1977 book The Comprehensive Guide to Board Wargaming, Nicholas Palmer also compared 1776 to SPI's The American Revolution: 1775 1783, and noted that in a poll of wargames taken the previous year, 1776 had been considerably more popular than its rival. Palmer also noted that "1776 is certainly very much more complicated [ ] A fine game requiring time, enthusiasm and concentration; definitely not for beginners." Palmer concluded that the game was unbalanced in favor of the British, saying, "if the players find the British winning too often, they should adjust the rules to cut down such unhistorical delights." In The Guide to Simulations/Games for Education and Training, Martin Campion commented on his experiences with this game in the classroom, saying, "I used the short games and the long games in my 'War' course. The students were content with the limited accuracy of the short games, but they severely criticized the long game as being too tricky and too unrealistic with its allowing perfect coordination on the British side." Campion concluded, "In general, the long game is too detailed and too long for class play." In the 1980 book The Complete Book of Wargames, game designer Jon Freeman noted that "When this game first appeared, it was widely criticized and generally disregarded. However, unlike most other games, 1776 has improved with age. The secret is to only play the Campaign Game with most of the optional rules." Freeman concluded, "The shorter scenarios simply don't do justice to the game; most are silly. The campaign, however, deserves more recognition than it has received."

A copy of 1776 is held in the collection of the Strong National Museum of Play (object 112.6185).