Кіріспе
Ороферн Никефор (грекше: Oρoφέρνης Nικηφόρoς, сондай-ақ Олоферн деп те аталады) — Антиох III Ұлы Антиохтың қызы Антиохис есімді әйелінің Митридат есімді баласы бар екенін көрсету үшін құрған екі ұлының бірі болды, себебі ол бала туа алмады (екіншісі Ариарат есімді болды). Бірақ ол кейін Митридатты дүниеге әкеліп, күйеуіне жалған ұлдары туралы айтты. Олар мұрагерлік дауды болдырмау үшін Рим мен Ионияға жіберілді. Ариарат V деп аталған заңды ұлы 163 жылы әкесінің орнын басты. Бірнеше жылдан кейін Ороферн Сириядағы Селевкид империясының патшасы болған Димитрий I Сотердің көмегімен оны тақтан құлатты. Ороферннің билігі қысқа ғана болды. Римдіктер Ариарат V-ті қайтадан билікке келтірді.
The information we have about Orophernes comes from Justin, Diodorus Siculus and Polybius, whose works have survived in fragments. Therefore, this information is incomplete. We also have very brief references to Orophernes in Appian and Zonaras. According to Justin, when Ariarathes V refused to marry the sister of Demetrius I, the latter welcomed Orophernes, who had come to him as a suppliant, and supported his claim to the throne of Cappadocia. For Demetrius this was a pretext for war as he wanted to enlarge his kingdom and increase his power by waging war on his neighbours. However, Orophernes plotted with the disgruntled people of Antioch to expel him. The conspiracy was discovered. Demetrius spared his life so that he could still pursue the war against Ariarathes V. He captured him and imprisoned at Seleucia, in his kingdom. The people of Antioch persisted with their rebellion. They were attacked by Demetrius, but they were supported by Ptolemy VI, the king of the Ptolemaic Kingdom of Egypt, Attalus II, the king of Pergamon, and Ariarathes V. They sent Balas, a young man, to pretend that he was the brother of Antiochus V and claim the throne by force. They called him Alexander (see Alexander Balas). The people believed him. He defeated Demetrius, who died in battle. Justin's brief account did not mention the deposition of Ariarathes V. This is recorded in the Periochae of Livy where an entry for book 47 says that "King Ariarathes of Cappadocia, who had been expelled from his kingdom on the initiative and with troops of king Demetrius "
Appian wrote that Demetrius deposed Ariarathes V and gave the throne of Cappadocia to Olophernes, who gave Demetrius 1000 talents for this. Diodorus Siculus wrote that Orophernes overthrew Ariarathes V and did not try to gain popular support. He raised money through forced contributions. He put many people to death. He gave Timotheus a gift of 50 talents and Demetrius a gift of 70 talents in addition to having paid him 600 talents and still owing him 400 talents (this is probably the money Appian said he paid Demetrius to overthrow Ariarathes). He began to make exactions on all his subjects and to confiscate the property of men "of the highest distinction." It is at this point that Balas (Diodorus did not give his name and only says that he was a youth who resembled Antiochus V) was sent to challenge Demetrius. In this account he was from Smyrna and he was sent by Attalus II, who was aggrieved by the expulsion of Ariarathes V and also had reasons for wanting to keep Demetrius in check. He gave him royal insignia and sent him to Zenophanes, a Cilician who had had a dispute with Demetrius and had been helped by Eumenes II, Attalus' father. This man spread the word that the youth wanted to reclaim his father's throne. In Polybius's account, Ariarathes V arrived in Rome in the summer of 158 BC. After the consuls for 157 BC, Sextus Julius Caesar and Lucius Aurelius Orestes, entered office he did some lobbying. He and his retinue dressed modestly to highlight his distressed situation. Miltiades arrived as an envoy of Demetrius to defend Demetrius and speak against Ariarathes. Orophernes sent a delegation headed by Timotheus and Diogenes to plead Orophernes' case and accuse Ariarathes V. They brought a crown dedicated to Rome, which was a way of pledging allegiance to Rome, and asked to renew Cappadocia's alliance with Rome. The lobbying of this delegation made a greater impression because it outnumbered Ariarathes, it appeared more prosperous and it disregarded truth. Since there was no one to refute falsehoods, it gained the day. However, in another passage, Polybius wrote that Ariobarzanes was restored and left Italy. Orophernes and Theotimus blamed each other for this. In another passage he summarised that Ariarathes was expelled by Orophernes through "the agency of King Demetrius" and recovered his throne "by the help of Attalus." He also noted that after Attalus succeeded his brother Eumenes his policy was to restore Ariarathes to his kingdom. That Ariarathes V was restored as sole ruler of Cappadocia rather than being ordered to be a co ruler with his alleged brother, is recorded in the Periochae: "King Ariarathes of Cappadocia was restored by the Senate. Unlike Polybius and Diodorus Siculus, Appian wrote the Romans "decided that as brothers both Ariarathes and Orophernes should reign together." Polybius related that soon after his succession to the throne in 163 BC, Ariarathes sent envoys to Rome to renew “the previously existing alliance.” This is also recorded in the Periochae. Polybius wrote that Orophernes did not hold the kingdom for long. He thought that Orophernes despised traditional Cappadocian customs and "introduced the refined debauchery of Ionia." He lost his kingdom and life because he fell victim to the passion for money and sacrificed his life for this. This view was echoed by Athenaeus, who regarded the Ionian luxury Orophernes introduced as being artificial. Polybius wrote that Orophernes, who had amassed a great sum, deposited 400 talents in the city of Priene for a rainy day. The town later returned the money. In another passage he wrote that after he was restored, Ariarathes V, who thought that the money belonged to the kingdom, asked Priene to return the money to him. The town refused to give it to anyone else while Orophernes was alive. Ariarathes sent a force to devastate its territory. Priene, which had sent envoys to Rhodes, now appealed to the Romans, who ignored this. Polybius commented that "[t]he Prienians had based high hopes on their command of so large a sum but the result was just the opposite. For they paid the deposit back to Orophernes, and unjustly suffered considerable damage at the hands of King Ariarathes owing to this same deposit." According to Diodorus Siculus, when Orophernes' situation worsened, he was worried about the pay for his soldiers and was afraid about a possible mutiny. Since he was without funds, he plundered a temple of Zeus, which was considered inviolable, to pay the wage arrears. Today Orophernes is mainly known for a poem written by the celebrated modern Greek poet Constantine P. Cavafy in 1915. In meditating on a tetradrachm found in Priene, the poet wrote "Orophernes," on the pretender's life and his adventures.
Ороферн туралы біздің мәліметтеріміз Юстин, Диодор Сицилий және Полибийдің еңбектерінен жеткен, олардың шығармалары фрагменттер түрінде сақталған. Сондықтан бұл ақпарат толық емес. Апиан мен Зонарада да Ороферн туралы қысқаша мәліметтер бар. Юстин айтуынша, Ариарат V Димитрий I-нің қарындасымен үйленгісі келмегендіктен, Димитрий I оны жалбарынып келген Орофернді қабылдап, Каппадокия тағына талапкерлігін қолдады. Димитрий көршілеріне қарсы соғыс арқылы өз патшалығын кеңейтіп, билігін арттыруды қалады. Алайда Ороферн Антиохия халқымен бірге оны елден қууды жоспарлады. Қастандық ашыққа шықты. Димитрий оның өмірін сақтап, Ариарат V-ке қарсы соғысты жалғастыруға мүмкіндік берді. Ол оны тұтқынға алып, өз патшалығындағы Селевкияда түрмеге қамады. Антиохия халқы көтеріліс көтерді. Димитрий оларға шабуыл жасады, бірақ Мысырдың Птолемей VI патшасы, Пергам патшасы Аттал II және Ариарат V оларды қолдады. Олар Антиох V-тің інісі екенін айту үшін жас Баласты жіберді. Олар оны Александр деп атады (Александр Баласқа қараңыз). Халық оған сенді. Ол Димитрийді жеңіп, шайқаста қаза тапты. Юстин Ариарат V-тің биліктен шеттетілуі туралы айтпады. Бұл Ливийдің «Периохеясында» жазылған, онда 47-кітапқа жазылған жазбада: «Каппадокия патшасы Ариарат, ол Димитрий патшасының бастамасымен және әскерлерімен өз патшалығынан қуылды» делінген.
The information we have about Orophernes comes from Justin, Diodorus Siculus and Polybius, whose works have survived in fragments. Therefore, this information is incomplete. We also have very brief references to Orophernes in Appian and Zonaras. According to Justin, when Ariarathes V refused to marry the sister of Demetrius I, the latter welcomed Orophernes, who had come to him as a suppliant, and supported his claim to the throne of Cappadocia. For Demetrius this was a pretext for war as he wanted to enlarge his kingdom and increase his power by waging war on his neighbours. However, Orophernes plotted with the disgruntled people of Antioch to expel him. The conspiracy was discovered. Demetrius spared his life so that he could still pursue the war against Ariarathes V. He captured him and imprisoned at Seleucia, in his kingdom. The people of Antioch persisted with their rebellion. They were attacked by Demetrius, but they were supported by Ptolemy VI, the king of the Ptolemaic Kingdom of Egypt, Attalus II, the king of Pergamon, and Ariarathes V. They sent Balas, a young man, to pretend that he was the brother of Antiochus V and claim the throne by force. They called him Alexander (see Alexander Balas). The people believed him. He defeated Demetrius, who died in battle. Justin's brief account did not mention the deposition of Ariarathes V. This is recorded in the Periochae of Livy where an entry for book 47 says that "King Ariarathes of Cappadocia, who had been expelled from his kingdom on the initiative and with troops of king Demetrius "
Appian wrote that Demetrius deposed Ariarathes V and gave the throne of Cappadocia to Olophernes, who gave Demetrius 1000 talents for this. Diodorus Siculus wrote that Orophernes overthrew Ariarathes V and did not try to gain popular support. He raised money through forced contributions. He put many people to death. He gave Timotheus a gift of 50 talents and Demetrius a gift of 70 talents in addition to having paid him 600 talents and still owing him 400 talents (this is probably the money Appian said he paid Demetrius to overthrow Ariarathes). He began to make exactions on all his subjects and to confiscate the property of men "of the highest distinction." It is at this point that Balas (Diodorus did not give his name and only says that he was a youth who resembled Antiochus V) was sent to challenge Demetrius. In this account he was from Smyrna and he was sent by Attalus II, who was aggrieved by the expulsion of Ariarathes V and also had reasons for wanting to keep Demetrius in check. He gave him royal insignia and sent him to Zenophanes, a Cilician who had had a dispute with Demetrius and had been helped by Eumenes II, Attalus' father. This man spread the word that the youth wanted to reclaim his father's throne. In Polybius's account, Ariarathes V arrived in Rome in the summer of 158 BC. After the consuls for 157 BC, Sextus Julius Caesar and Lucius Aurelius Orestes, entered office he did some lobbying. He and his retinue dressed modestly to highlight his distressed situation. Miltiades arrived as an envoy of Demetrius to defend Demetrius and speak against Ariarathes. Orophernes sent a delegation headed by Timotheus and Diogenes to plead Orophernes' case and accuse Ariarathes V. They brought a crown dedicated to Rome, which was a way of pledging allegiance to Rome, and asked to renew Cappadocia's alliance with Rome. The lobbying of this delegation made a greater impression because it outnumbered Ariarathes, it appeared more prosperous and it disregarded truth. Since there was no one to refute falsehoods, it gained the day. However, in another passage, Polybius wrote that Ariobarzanes was restored and left Italy. Orophernes and Theotimus blamed each other for this. In another passage he summarised that Ariarathes was expelled by Orophernes through "the agency of King Demetrius" and recovered his throne "by the help of Attalus." He also noted that after Attalus succeeded his brother Eumenes his policy was to restore Ariarathes to his kingdom. That Ariarathes V was restored as sole ruler of Cappadocia rather than being ordered to be a co ruler with his alleged brother, is recorded in the Periochae: "King Ariarathes of Cappadocia was restored by the Senate. Unlike Polybius and Diodorus Siculus, Appian wrote the Romans "decided that as brothers both Ariarathes and Orophernes should reign together." Polybius related that soon after his succession to the throne in 163 BC, Ariarathes sent envoys to Rome to renew “the previously existing alliance.” This is also recorded in the Periochae. Polybius wrote that Orophernes did not hold the kingdom for long. He thought that Orophernes despised traditional Cappadocian customs and "introduced the refined debauchery of Ionia." He lost his kingdom and life because he fell victim to the passion for money and sacrificed his life for this. This view was echoed by Athenaeus, who regarded the Ionian luxury Orophernes introduced as being artificial. Polybius wrote that Orophernes, who had amassed a great sum, deposited 400 talents in the city of Priene for a rainy day. The town later returned the money. In another passage he wrote that after he was restored, Ariarathes V, who thought that the money belonged to the kingdom, asked Priene to return the money to him. The town refused to give it to anyone else while Orophernes was alive. Ariarathes sent a force to devastate its territory. Priene, which had sent envoys to Rhodes, now appealed to the Romans, who ignored this. Polybius commented that "[t]he Prienians had based high hopes on their command of so large a sum but the result was just the opposite. For they paid the deposit back to Orophernes, and unjustly suffered considerable damage at the hands of King Ariarathes owing to this same deposit." According to Diodorus Siculus, when Orophernes' situation worsened, he was worried about the pay for his soldiers and was afraid about a possible mutiny. Since he was without funds, he plundered a temple of Zeus, which was considered inviolable, to pay the wage arrears. Today Orophernes is mainly known for a poem written by the celebrated modern Greek poet Constantine P. Cavafy in 1915. In meditating on a tetradrachm found in Priene, the poet wrote "Orophernes," on the pretender's life and his adventures.
Аппиан Димитрийдің Ариарат V-ті биліктен алып тастап, Каппадокия тағын Олофернге бергенін, ол Димитрийге 1000 талант бергенін жазды. Диодор Сицилий Ороферннің Ариарат V-ті құлатқанын, бірақ халықтың қолдауын алуға тырыспағанын айтады. Ол ақшаны мәжбүрлеп жинады, көптеген адамдарды өлімге жіберді. Ол Тимофейге 50 талант, Димитрийге 70 талант сыйлады, сонымен қатар оған 600 талант төледі және әлі де 400 талант берешегі бар (бұл, мүмкін, Ариаратты құлату үшін Димитрийге төлеген ақша). Ол барлық азаматтарынан айып талап ете бастады және «ең қадірлі» адамдардың мүліктерін тартып алды. Осы кезде Димитрийге қарсы шығу үшін Баласты (Диодор оның есімін атаған жоқ, тек Антиох V-ке ұқсайтын жас жігіт екенін ғана айтады) жіберді. Бұл жазбада ол Смирнадан келген және оны Ариарат V-тің қуылғанына ренжіді және Димитрийді тежеуге себептері болған Аттал II жіберген. Ол оған патшалық белгілерін беріп, Димитриймен дауласқан және оған Атталдың әкесі Евмен II көмек көрсеткен Киликиялық Зенофанға жіберді. Бұл кісі жас жігіттің әкесінің тағын қайтарып алғысы келетінін жариялады.
The information we have about Orophernes comes from Justin, Diodorus Siculus and Polybius, whose works have survived in fragments. Therefore, this information is incomplete. We also have very brief references to Orophernes in Appian and Zonaras. According to Justin, when Ariarathes V refused to marry the sister of Demetrius I, the latter welcomed Orophernes, who had come to him as a suppliant, and supported his claim to the throne of Cappadocia. For Demetrius this was a pretext for war as he wanted to enlarge his kingdom and increase his power by waging war on his neighbours. However, Orophernes plotted with the disgruntled people of Antioch to expel him. The conspiracy was discovered. Demetrius spared his life so that he could still pursue the war against Ariarathes V. He captured him and imprisoned at Seleucia, in his kingdom. The people of Antioch persisted with their rebellion. They were attacked by Demetrius, but they were supported by Ptolemy VI, the king of the Ptolemaic Kingdom of Egypt, Attalus II, the king of Pergamon, and Ariarathes V. They sent Balas, a young man, to pretend that he was the brother of Antiochus V and claim the throne by force. They called him Alexander (see Alexander Balas). The people believed him. He defeated Demetrius, who died in battle. Justin's brief account did not mention the deposition of Ariarathes V. This is recorded in the Periochae of Livy where an entry for book 47 says that "King Ariarathes of Cappadocia, who had been expelled from his kingdom on the initiative and with troops of king Demetrius "
Appian wrote that Demetrius deposed Ariarathes V and gave the throne of Cappadocia to Olophernes, who gave Demetrius 1000 talents for this. Diodorus Siculus wrote that Orophernes overthrew Ariarathes V and did not try to gain popular support. He raised money through forced contributions. He put many people to death. He gave Timotheus a gift of 50 talents and Demetrius a gift of 70 talents in addition to having paid him 600 talents and still owing him 400 talents (this is probably the money Appian said he paid Demetrius to overthrow Ariarathes). He began to make exactions on all his subjects and to confiscate the property of men "of the highest distinction." It is at this point that Balas (Diodorus did not give his name and only says that he was a youth who resembled Antiochus V) was sent to challenge Demetrius. In this account he was from Smyrna and he was sent by Attalus II, who was aggrieved by the expulsion of Ariarathes V and also had reasons for wanting to keep Demetrius in check. He gave him royal insignia and sent him to Zenophanes, a Cilician who had had a dispute with Demetrius and had been helped by Eumenes II, Attalus' father. This man spread the word that the youth wanted to reclaim his father's throne. In Polybius's account, Ariarathes V arrived in Rome in the summer of 158 BC. After the consuls for 157 BC, Sextus Julius Caesar and Lucius Aurelius Orestes, entered office he did some lobbying. He and his retinue dressed modestly to highlight his distressed situation. Miltiades arrived as an envoy of Demetrius to defend Demetrius and speak against Ariarathes. Orophernes sent a delegation headed by Timotheus and Diogenes to plead Orophernes' case and accuse Ariarathes V. They brought a crown dedicated to Rome, which was a way of pledging allegiance to Rome, and asked to renew Cappadocia's alliance with Rome. The lobbying of this delegation made a greater impression because it outnumbered Ariarathes, it appeared more prosperous and it disregarded truth. Since there was no one to refute falsehoods, it gained the day. However, in another passage, Polybius wrote that Ariobarzanes was restored and left Italy. Orophernes and Theotimus blamed each other for this. In another passage he summarised that Ariarathes was expelled by Orophernes through "the agency of King Demetrius" and recovered his throne "by the help of Attalus." He also noted that after Attalus succeeded his brother Eumenes his policy was to restore Ariarathes to his kingdom. That Ariarathes V was restored as sole ruler of Cappadocia rather than being ordered to be a co ruler with his alleged brother, is recorded in the Periochae: "King Ariarathes of Cappadocia was restored by the Senate. Unlike Polybius and Diodorus Siculus, Appian wrote the Romans "decided that as brothers both Ariarathes and Orophernes should reign together." Polybius related that soon after his succession to the throne in 163 BC, Ariarathes sent envoys to Rome to renew “the previously existing alliance.” This is also recorded in the Periochae. Polybius wrote that Orophernes did not hold the kingdom for long. He thought that Orophernes despised traditional Cappadocian customs and "introduced the refined debauchery of Ionia." He lost his kingdom and life because he fell victim to the passion for money and sacrificed his life for this. This view was echoed by Athenaeus, who regarded the Ionian luxury Orophernes introduced as being artificial. Polybius wrote that Orophernes, who had amassed a great sum, deposited 400 talents in the city of Priene for a rainy day. The town later returned the money. In another passage he wrote that after he was restored, Ariarathes V, who thought that the money belonged to the kingdom, asked Priene to return the money to him. The town refused to give it to anyone else while Orophernes was alive. Ariarathes sent a force to devastate its territory. Priene, which had sent envoys to Rhodes, now appealed to the Romans, who ignored this. Polybius commented that "[t]he Prienians had based high hopes on their command of so large a sum but the result was just the opposite. For they paid the deposit back to Orophernes, and unjustly suffered considerable damage at the hands of King Ariarathes owing to this same deposit." According to Diodorus Siculus, when Orophernes' situation worsened, he was worried about the pay for his soldiers and was afraid about a possible mutiny. Since he was without funds, he plundered a temple of Zeus, which was considered inviolable, to pay the wage arrears. Today Orophernes is mainly known for a poem written by the celebrated modern Greek poet Constantine P. Cavafy in 1915. In meditating on a tetradrachm found in Priene, the poet wrote "Orophernes," on the pretender's life and his adventures.
Полибийдің есебі бойынша, Ариарат V Римге б.з.д. 158 жылы келді. Б.з.д. 157 жылы консул болған Секст Юлий Цезарь мен Луций Аврелий Орест қызметке кіргеннен кейін ол лоббилік әрекеттер жасады. Ол және оның серіктері қиын жағдайын көрсету үшін қарапайым киінді. Мильтиад Димитрийдің елшісі ретінде келіп, Димитрийді қорғап, Ариаратқа қарсы сөйледі. Ороферн Тимофей мен Диоген бастаған делегацияны жіберіп, Ороферннің ісіне қолдау білдірді және Ариарат V-ті айыптады. Олар Римге бағышталған тәж әкелді, бұл Римге адалдықты білдірудің жолы болды және Каппадокияның Риммен одақтастығын жаңартуды сұрады. Бұл делегацияның лоббисі көбірек әсер қалдырды, өйткені олар Ариараттан көп болды, олар өркендеген көрінді және шындықты елемеді. Жалғандықты жоққа шығаратын ешкім болмағандықтан, ол күнді жеңіп алды. Бірақ басқа бір үзіндіде Полибий Ариобарзанның қайтадан билікке келгенін және Италиядан кеткенін жазды. Ороферн мен Теотим бұл үшін бірін-бірін кінәлады. Басқа бір үзіндіде ол Ариаратты Ороферн «Димитрий патшасының көмегімен» қуғанын және «Атталдың көмегімен» тағын қайтарып алғанын айтады. Ол сондай-ақ Аттал ағасы Эуменді алмастырғаннан кейін, оның саясаты Ариаратты патшалығына қайтару болды. «Периохеяда» Ариарат V-тің Каппадокияның жалғыз билеушісі ретінде қайтадан билікке келгені туралы айтылған: «Каппадокия патшасы Ариаратты Сенат қайтадан билікке келтірді». Полибий мен Диодор Сицилийден айырмасы, Аппиан римдіктердің «Ариарат пен Ороферн екеуі де бірге билік етуі керек деп шешкенін» жазды. Полибийдің айтуынша, Ариарат V 163 жылы таққа отырғаннан кейін Риммен «бұрынғы одақты жаңарту» үшін Римге елшілер жіберді. Бұл «Периохеяда» да жазылған. Полибий Ороферн патшалықты ұзақ уақытқа сақтамағанын жазды. Ол Ороферн Каппадокияның дәстүрлі әдет-ғұрыптарын жек көріп, «Ионияның мәдениетсіз әдеттерін енгізгенін» айтты. Ол ақшаға құмарлықтың құрбаны болды және өмірін осы үшін құрбан етті. Афиней бұл пікірге қосылды, Ороферн енгізген Иониялық сәнділікті жасанды деп санады. Полибий Ороферн көп ақша жинап, «жаман күнге» деп Приен қаласында 400 талант сақтағанын жазды. Кейін қала осы ақшаны қайтарды. Басқа бір үзіндіде ол Ариарат V-тің қайтадан билікке келгеннен кейін, ақша патшалыққа тиесілі деп ойлап, Приеннен оны қайтаруын сұрағанын айтады. Қала Ороферн тірі болғанда ешкімге бергісі келмеді. Ариарат оның аумағын жойды. Приен, Римге елшілер жібергеннен кейін, римдіктерге шағымданды, бірақ олар оған құлақ қоймады. Полибий: «Приендіктер осы үлкен сомаға үлкен үміт арнады, бірақ нәтижесі кері болды. Олар ақшаны Орофернге қайтарды және осы ақшаның арқасында Ариарат патшасынан көп зиян шекті» деді. Диодор Сицилийдің айтуынша, Ороферннің жағдайы нашарлағанда, ол әскерлеріне жалақы төлеу туралы алаңдады және көтеріліс болуінен қорқады. Ақшасы болмағандықтан, ол қасиетті деп есептелген Зевс храмын тонап, жалақыны төледі. Бүгінде Ороферн ең белгілісі — 1915 жылы грек ақыны Константин П. Кавафис жазған өлең. Приенде табылған тетрадрахма туралы ойланып, ақын Ороферннің өмірі мен оқиғалары туралы жазды.
The information we have about Orophernes comes from Justin, Diodorus Siculus and Polybius, whose works have survived in fragments. Therefore, this information is incomplete. We also have very brief references to Orophernes in Appian and Zonaras. According to Justin, when Ariarathes V refused to marry the sister of Demetrius I, the latter welcomed Orophernes, who had come to him as a suppliant, and supported his claim to the throne of Cappadocia. For Demetrius this was a pretext for war as he wanted to enlarge his kingdom and increase his power by waging war on his neighbours. However, Orophernes plotted with the disgruntled people of Antioch to expel him. The conspiracy was discovered. Demetrius spared his life so that he could still pursue the war against Ariarathes V. He captured him and imprisoned at Seleucia, in his kingdom. The people of Antioch persisted with their rebellion. They were attacked by Demetrius, but they were supported by Ptolemy VI, the king of the Ptolemaic Kingdom of Egypt, Attalus II, the king of Pergamon, and Ariarathes V. They sent Balas, a young man, to pretend that he was the brother of Antiochus V and claim the throne by force. They called him Alexander (see Alexander Balas). The people believed him. He defeated Demetrius, who died in battle. Justin's brief account did not mention the deposition of Ariarathes V. This is recorded in the Periochae of Livy where an entry for book 47 says that "King Ariarathes of Cappadocia, who had been expelled from his kingdom on the initiative and with troops of king Demetrius "
Appian wrote that Demetrius deposed Ariarathes V and gave the throne of Cappadocia to Olophernes, who gave Demetrius 1000 talents for this. Diodorus Siculus wrote that Orophernes overthrew Ariarathes V and did not try to gain popular support. He raised money through forced contributions. He put many people to death. He gave Timotheus a gift of 50 talents and Demetrius a gift of 70 talents in addition to having paid him 600 talents and still owing him 400 talents (this is probably the money Appian said he paid Demetrius to overthrow Ariarathes). He began to make exactions on all his subjects and to confiscate the property of men "of the highest distinction." It is at this point that Balas (Diodorus did not give his name and only says that he was a youth who resembled Antiochus V) was sent to challenge Demetrius. In this account he was from Smyrna and he was sent by Attalus II, who was aggrieved by the expulsion of Ariarathes V and also had reasons for wanting to keep Demetrius in check. He gave him royal insignia and sent him to Zenophanes, a Cilician who had had a dispute with Demetrius and had been helped by Eumenes II, Attalus' father. This man spread the word that the youth wanted to reclaim his father's throne. In Polybius's account, Ariarathes V arrived in Rome in the summer of 158 BC. After the consuls for 157 BC, Sextus Julius Caesar and Lucius Aurelius Orestes, entered office he did some lobbying. He and his retinue dressed modestly to highlight his distressed situation. Miltiades arrived as an envoy of Demetrius to defend Demetrius and speak against Ariarathes. Orophernes sent a delegation headed by Timotheus and Diogenes to plead Orophernes' case and accuse Ariarathes V. They brought a crown dedicated to Rome, which was a way of pledging allegiance to Rome, and asked to renew Cappadocia's alliance with Rome. The lobbying of this delegation made a greater impression because it outnumbered Ariarathes, it appeared more prosperous and it disregarded truth. Since there was no one to refute falsehoods, it gained the day. However, in another passage, Polybius wrote that Ariobarzanes was restored and left Italy. Orophernes and Theotimus blamed each other for this. In another passage he summarised that Ariarathes was expelled by Orophernes through "the agency of King Demetrius" and recovered his throne "by the help of Attalus." He also noted that after Attalus succeeded his brother Eumenes his policy was to restore Ariarathes to his kingdom. That Ariarathes V was restored as sole ruler of Cappadocia rather than being ordered to be a co ruler with his alleged brother, is recorded in the Periochae: "King Ariarathes of Cappadocia was restored by the Senate. Unlike Polybius and Diodorus Siculus, Appian wrote the Romans "decided that as brothers both Ariarathes and Orophernes should reign together." Polybius related that soon after his succession to the throne in 163 BC, Ariarathes sent envoys to Rome to renew “the previously existing alliance.” This is also recorded in the Periochae. Polybius wrote that Orophernes did not hold the kingdom for long. He thought that Orophernes despised traditional Cappadocian customs and "introduced the refined debauchery of Ionia." He lost his kingdom and life because he fell victim to the passion for money and sacrificed his life for this. This view was echoed by Athenaeus, who regarded the Ionian luxury Orophernes introduced as being artificial. Polybius wrote that Orophernes, who had amassed a great sum, deposited 400 talents in the city of Priene for a rainy day. The town later returned the money. In another passage he wrote that after he was restored, Ariarathes V, who thought that the money belonged to the kingdom, asked Priene to return the money to him. The town refused to give it to anyone else while Orophernes was alive. Ariarathes sent a force to devastate its territory. Priene, which had sent envoys to Rhodes, now appealed to the Romans, who ignored this. Polybius commented that "[t]he Prienians had based high hopes on their command of so large a sum but the result was just the opposite. For they paid the deposit back to Orophernes, and unjustly suffered considerable damage at the hands of King Ariarathes owing to this same deposit." According to Diodorus Siculus, when Orophernes' situation worsened, he was worried about the pay for his soldiers and was afraid about a possible mutiny. Since he was without funds, he plundered a temple of Zeus, which was considered inviolable, to pay the wage arrears. Today Orophernes is mainly known for a poem written by the celebrated modern Greek poet Constantine P. Cavafy in 1915. In meditating on a tetradrachm found in Priene, the poet wrote "Orophernes," on the pretender's life and his adventures.