Богатство и бедность народов: Почему одни страны богаты, а другие бедны.

1998 book by David Landes

The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some are So Rich and Some So Poor is a 1998 book by historian and economist David Landes (1924–2013). He attempted to explain why some countries and regions experienced near miraculous periods of explosive growth while the rest of the world stagnated. The book compared the long term economic histories of different regions, specifically Europe, United States, Japan, China, the Arab world, and Latin America. In addition to analyzing economic and cliometric figures, he credited intangible assets, such as culture and enterprise, to explain economic success or failure. Landes was Emeritus Professor of Economics and Coolidge Professor of History at Harvard University.

Critics have charged Landes with eurocentrism in his analysis, a charge which Landes himself does not deny; in fact, he embraces it explicitly, arguing that an explanation for an economic miracle that happened originally only in Europe (though he deals with the later "Asian miracle" in Wealth and Poverty) must of necessity be a Eurocentric analysis, thus siding at least at some level with thinkers such as Bernard Lewis. Following Daniel Bell, knowledge is the necessary link between "The European miracle" and the American post industrial society. Landes and Andre Gunder Frank, author of ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age , are noted for having come to very different conclusions about the long term significance of economic developments in "the West" during the modern era and publicly debated their findings in 1998 at Northwestern University. Additionally, an alternate theory relies on literacy and the gap between Protestants and Catholics as an explanation for the difference in economic results. The economist Paul Krugman remarked in "The Trouble with History", an article published on his MIT hosted blog, that the book, while containing an enormous amount of information, offered very few ideas. "What [does] Landes actually believe? And the answer, which seems to me to be damning, is that I am not sure. [ ] So I am still waiting for a book that helps me understand what really happened in this utterly perplexing century Whoever writes that book will have to be a person unafraid of offering theories as well as facts, and therefore of saying things that might turn out to be wrong."