Ұлттық сезімнің пайда болуы мен таралуы: «Құбылалы қоғамдар» кітабы туралы ойлар.

1983 book by Benedict Anderson
the book

Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism is a book by Benedict Anderson about the development of national feeling in different eras and throughout different geographies across the world. It introduced the term "imagined communities" as a descriptor of a social group—specifically nations—and the term has since entered standard usage in myriad political and social science fields. The book was first published in 1983 and was reissued with additional chapters in 1991 and a further revised version in 2006. The book is widely considered influential in the social sciences, with Eric G. E. Zuelow describing the book as "perhaps the most read book about nationalism." It is among the top 10 most cited publications in the social sciences.

According to Anderson, nations are socially constructed. For Anderson, the idea of the "nation" is relatively new and is a product of various socio material forces. He defined a nation as "an imagined political community—and imagined as both inherently limited and sovereign". As Anderson puts it, a nation "is imagined because the members of even the smallest nation will never know most of their fellow members, meet them, or even hear of them, yet in the minds of each lives the image of their communion." The second criticism was its masculine vision of nationalism: "the very term horizontal comradeship [ ] brings with it connotations of masculine solidarity" (Linda McDowell, 1999: 195). Adrian Hastings criticized the modernist interpretations of Anderson and another Marxist historian, Eric Hobsbawm for restricting the emergence of nationalism to the modern period and the eighteenth century as ignoring the national feelings of the medieval period and the framework for national coexistence within the Bible and Christian theology. Dean Kostantaras argued that Anderson's study of nationalism was far too broad, and the topic required a much more thorough investigation. Writing in a retrospective essay for The New Republic in 2024, Samuel Clowes Huneke argued that the book suffered from flaws in its Marxist framework, stating that it "cannot explain the devotion that nations have and continue to inspire" while arguing further that Anderson's emphasis on "nations inspiring love" ignores a history of racism in the rise of nationalism, ultimately claiming that while the book "offers a compelling account of nationalism’s origins, then, it speaks little to the guises in which nationalism has reappeared in the twenty first century," at the same time "[t]he notion that the conjoined spread of capitalism and nationalism—both of which were amply wrapped up in colonialism—had nothing to do with racism is risible."